Why America and Israel are Afraid of Iran? A Geopolitical Case Study

Introduction

The geopolitical relationship between Iran, the United States, and Israel is deeply intertwined with decades of history, marked by complex political, ideological, and security concerns. Iran, a major player in the Middle East, has often been at the center of tensions with both the United States and Israel. These tensions, which span military, political, and ideological lines, are based on a series of fears, mistrust, and competition for regional dominance. America and Israel’s wariness of Iran, often seen as a challenge to regional and international stability, revolves around its nuclear ambitions, its influence on regional conflicts, its revolutionary ideology, and its potential to alter the balance of power in the Middle East.

In this article, we will explore why America and Israel perceive Iran as a threat. We will examine the historical context of their relationship with Iran, the key concerns regarding Iran’s nuclear program, its regional influence, its ideological underpinnings, and the broader implications of its growing power. This article will also shed light on how these fears manifest in the policies of both America and Israel, and how they have shaped their responses to Iran over the past several decades.

1. The History of Iran-U.S.-Israel Relations

To understand the current dynamics between Iran, the U.S., and Israel, we must first look at the historical context of their relations.

The Fall of the Shah and the Rise of the Islamic Republic

The relationship between Iran and the United States began on relatively cordial terms before the 1979 Iranian Revolution. Under the leadership of Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, the Shah of Iran, Iran was considered an ally of the United States. The Shah maintained a pro-Western stance, and the U.S. saw Iran as an important regional ally and a bulwark against Soviet influence in the Middle East during the Cold War. The U.S. provided significant military and economic support to the Shah’s regime, which was viewed by many as authoritarian and out of touch with the Iranian people.

However, the Iranian Revolution of 1979, led by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, drastically shifted the political landscape. The revolution resulted in the overthrow of the Shah and the establishment of the Islamic Republic of Iran. This shift was profoundly anti-Western, with Khomeini’s regime emphasizing a commitment to Islamic principles, the rejection of Western imperialism, and a deep distrust of the United States. The revolution marked the beginning of a long period of hostility between Iran and the U.S.

The culmination of this shift came with the U.S. Embassy hostage crisis, in which 52 American diplomats were taken hostage by Iranian militants for 444 days. This event solidified the adversarial relationship between the U.S. and Iran, with the U.S. severing diplomatic ties and imposing economic sanctions.

Israel and Iran Before 1979

Israel, like the U.S., had a complicated relationship with Iran prior to the revolution. The two countries had established a relatively strong working relationship during the reign of the Shah. Iran provided Israel with oil, and the two countries engaged in intelligence sharing and military cooperation. This cooperation was largely driven by shared interests in containing the influence of Arab nationalist movements and the Soviet Union. However, following the 1979 revolution, the Islamic Republic severed its ties with Israel, marking the beginning of a period of hostility.

After the revolution, Iran became a vocal supporter of the Palestinian cause, and the Iranian leadership condemned Israel’s existence, calling for the establishment of a Palestinian state. Iran’s support for anti-Israel militant groups, such as Hezbollah and Hamas, has been a key factor in the continued animosity between the two countries.

2. Iran’s Nuclear Program: A Key Source of Concern

One of the primary reasons America and Israel are so concerned about Iran is its nuclear program. The fear that Iran could develop nuclear weapons has been a consistent issue for both nations, leading to tensions, sanctions, and diplomatic efforts to prevent the country from acquiring such capabilities.

The Nuclear Race in the Middle East

Iran’s nuclear ambitions date back to the 1950s, when it first sought to develop nuclear technology for peaceful purposes, including energy production. However, after the Islamic Revolution in 1979, the program was suspended due to political and ideological shifts. It wasn’t until the early 2000s that concerns began to grow internationally over Iran’s intentions. Iran resumed its nuclear activities, claiming they were for peaceful purposes, but the international community remained skeptical, with many suspecting that Iran was secretly working towards developing nuclear weapons.

For the United States and Israel, the prospect of a nuclear-armed Iran poses a significant threat to the region’s security. Iran’s nuclear capability would shift the balance of power in the Middle East, providing it with leverage over its regional rivals. This would be particularly concerning to Israel, which is already the only nuclear-armed state in the region, as it could face a strategic deterrence challenge from an Iranian nuclear arsenal.

Diplomatic Efforts and the JCPOA

In response to these concerns, the U.S. and Israel have pursued various strategies to curb Iran’s nuclear ambitions. One of the most significant diplomatic efforts was the negotiation of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in 2015, an agreement between Iran and six world powers (the U.S., the U.K., Russia, China, France, and Germany). Under the agreement, Iran agreed to limit its nuclear program in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions.

While the Obama administration hailed the JCPOA as a diplomatic breakthrough, many in Israel and among U.S. Republicans criticized the deal, arguing that it did not go far enough to prevent Iran from eventually acquiring nuclear weapons. Israel’s Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, famously denounced the deal, warning that it would lead to a nuclear-armed Iran.

The Trump administration took a hardline stance against the JCPOA and withdrew the U.S. from the agreement in 2018, re-imposing sanctions on Iran. This move was strongly supported by Israel, which viewed the deal as inadequate in curbing Iran’s nuclear ambitions. The Biden administration has expressed interest in returning to the agreement, but Iran’s continued nuclear advancements and regional behavior have complicated efforts to revive the deal.

3. Iran’s Regional Influence: A Major Concern

Iran’s influence over its neighbors and its role in regional conflicts is another reason for America and Israel’s fear. Since the 1979 revolution, Iran has sought to expand its influence across the Middle East, often using proxy forces, alliances, and support for militant groups to further its strategic goals. This has brought Iran into direct conflict with American allies, particularly Israel and Saudi Arabia.

Proxy Warfare and Militancy

Iran’s primary strategy for projecting power in the Middle East has been through proxy warfare. The Iranian government supports and funds various non-state actors, including Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas in Gaza, and a range of militia groups in Iraq and Syria. These groups serve as Iran’s tools for extending its influence while allowing it to maintain plausible deniability regarding its direct involvement in regional conflicts.

Israel views Hezbollah, in particular, as a major threat, given its proximity to Israel’s northern border and its stockpiling of advanced weapons. Hezbollah’s fighters have engaged in numerous confrontations with Israeli forces, most notably during the 2006 Lebanon War. Iran’s support for Hezbollah and other groups that are hostile to Israel has only increased Israel’s fear of an Iranian regional hegemony.

Similarly, Iran’s involvement in the Syrian Civil War, where it has supported the government of Bashar al-Assad, has raised alarms for Israel and the U.S. Israel has expressed concerns over Iran’s growing military presence in Syria, where Iranian-backed forces have established footholds near the Israeli border. Israel has repeatedly warned that it will not allow Iran to entrench itself militarily in Syria and has carried out numerous airstrikes against Iranian military targets in the country.

Iran’s Role in Iraq and Yemen

Iran has also expanded its influence in Iraq, particularly after the 2003 U.S. invasion, which toppled Saddam Hussein. Iran has cultivated strong relationships with Shiite militias and political factions in Iraq, positioning itself as a dominant force in the country’s post-Saddam political order. This has led to concerns in the U.S. and among its allies that Iran could use Iraq as a launching pad for further destabilizing the region.

In Yemen, Iran has supported the Houthi rebels in their ongoing conflict against the internationally recognized government, which is backed by a Saudi-led coalition. This involvement has exacerbated the proxy war between Iran and Saudi Arabia, further complicating regional security.

4. Ideological Factors: Iran’s Revolutionary Stance

Beyond Iran’s nuclear program and regional influence, its ideological stance is a key factor that makes both the U.S. and Israel wary. The Islamic Republic of Iran, under the leadership of the Ayatollahs, has adopted a radical anti-Western and anti-Israel ideology, which has shaped its policies for over four decades. Iran’s commitment to exporting its Islamic revolution and its calls for the destruction of Israel are central to the fears that America and Israel have about Iran.

Iran’s Anti-Israel Rhetoric

Iran’s leadership has consistently voiced its opposition to Israel’s existence, calling for the establishment of a Palestinian state and condemning Israel’s policies towards Palestinians. This rhetoric has been particularly pronounced under the leadership of Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The Iranian government has regularly called for the “liberation” of Jerusalem and the end of Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territories, aligning itself with militant groups that share this goal.

The Islamic Republic’s ideological commitment to opposing Israel is a source of great concern for the Jewish state. Israel views Iran’s open calls for its destruction as an existential threat, and its support for groups like Hamas and Hezbollah is seen as an effort to destabilize the region and undermine Israel’s security.

The Role of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)

The IRGC, Iran’s powerful military and paramilitary force, plays a central role in advancing the Islamic Republic’s revolutionary goals. It oversees Iran’s missile program, its proxy forces across the Middle East, and its involvement in regional conflicts. The IRGC’s activities are viewed as a direct challenge to American and Israeli interests in the region, particularly as it builds up missile capabilities that could be used to target U.S. allies and military assets.

The U.S. has designated the IRGC as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO), citing its involvement in supporting terrorism and destabilizing activities across the Middle East. Israel has also expressed concerns about the IRGC’s growing influence in Syria and Iraq.

5. The Fear of a New Regional Power

Ultimately, the fears that both America and Israel have regarding Iran stem from the potential for Iran to emerge as a dominant regional power in the Middle East. With

its large population, strategic location, and expanding military capabilities, Iran poses a direct challenge to the existing balance of power in the region. The U.S. and Israel view Iran’s rising influence as a threat not just to their own security but to the broader stability of the Middle East.

Iran’s quest for regional hegemony, coupled with its nuclear ambitions and revolutionary ideology, has made it a focal point of concern for both America and Israel. The fear is that Iran’s continued rise could lead to an altered geopolitical order in the Middle East, one that is less favorable to American interests and more aligned with Iran’s vision of a multipolar world where it plays a dominant role.

Conclusion

America and Israel’s fear of Iran is not based on a singular issue but is a complex amalgamation of concerns. From Iran’s nuclear ambitions and its growing influence in regional conflicts to its revolutionary ideology and anti-Israel rhetoric, the Islamic Republic presents a multifaceted challenge to the geopolitical interests of both the United States and Israel. The long-standing animosity, shaped by history, politics, and ideology, continues to define the relationship between these countries, leading to ongoing tensions, diplomatic confrontations, and regional conflicts. As Iran continues to exert its influence and advance its strategic objectives, the fears of America and Israel are likely to persist, driving their policies and actions in the Middle East.

References:

Video Courtesy: https://www.youtube.com/@ThinkSchool